9.6 Smoking, ill health, financial stress and smoking-related poverty among highly disadvantaged groups

Last updated: December 2016 

Suggested citation: Greenhalgh, EM, Scollo, MM, & Pearce, M. 9.6 Smoking, ill-health, financial stress and smoking-related poverty among highly disadvantaged groups. In Scollo, MM and Winstanley, MH [editors]. Tobacco in Australia: Facts and issues. Melbourne: Cancer Council Victoria; 2016. Available from: www.tobaccoinaustralia.org.au/chapter-9-disadvantage/9-6-smoking-ill-health-financial-stress-and-smokin

This section draws heavily on sources identified and material that appears in Chapter 1, Sections 1.8 to 1.10.

In addition to the disparities in smoking among broad categories of socio-economic status, smoking rates are even higher among many groups of highly disadvantaged people.  These include: 

9.6.1  People living in regional and remote areas of Australia

9.6.2  People born overseas

9.6.3  Lone parents, especially lone mothers

9.6.4  People with mental and substance use disorders

9.6.5  The homeless

9.6.6  Prison populations

9.6.7 Veterans

See Chapter 7, Section 7.19 for a detailed overview of targeted cessation interventions for the groups mentioned above and additional groups with very high smoking prevalence, including low-income groups and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people. Chapter 8 provides a full discussion of smoking among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. 

9.6.1 People living in regional and remote areas of Australia

In 2014, about 29% of Australians lived outside major cities; 26.9% in regional areas and 2.3% in remote or very remote areas.1  

In 2014–15, people living in outer regional and remote areas had higher rates of daily smoking (20.9%) than people in inner regional areas (16.7%) or major cities (13.0%). Prevalence has declined among all groups over time; however, the current rate for people living in outer regional and remote areas is about the same as that of major cities a decade ago.2  They also report higher rates of smoking-related diseases, such as arthritis, asthma, COPD, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease, and are more likely to experience psychological distress and to report suffering a mental disorder.2    Life expectancy decreases with increasing remoteness. In 2009–2011, people living in remote and very remote areas had mortality rates 1.4 times as high as people living in major cities.1   

Compared with people in regional areas and major cities, those living in remote and very remote areas often have poorer access to, and use of, health care services. They are also less likely to participate in breast and bowel cancer screening, have higher rates of potentially avoidable hospitalisations, and lower access to selected hospital procedures.1  Because health professionals are in such short supply in rural and remote areas, it is often difficult to prioritise preventive health activities. The National Strategic Framework for Rural and Remote Health sets out goals: 

to improve access to healthcare

to ensure effective and appropriate and sustainable healthcare delivery

for an appropriate, skilled and well-supported health workforce

for collaborative health service planning and policy development and strong leadership, governance, transparency and accountability.3  

The 2012–18 National Tobacco Strategy outlines a number of aims to reduce smoking among priority populations, including those living in regional and remote areas. These include population-based approaches such as social marketing campaigns, tax increases, and smokefree legislation, as well as ensuring access to individual cessation support, such as Quitline services, online services, specialised services, and brief interventions by health professionals.4  Subsidies of cessation medications also aim to increase use and access.4  Since 2011, all Australians have been able to access subsidised over-the-counter nicotine replacement therapy patches. Bupropion and varenicline are only available on prescription, but have been available on Australia’s PBS since 2001 and 2008 respectively (see Section 7.16). 

9.6.2 People born overseas

In 2014–15, people born overseas comprised 28 per cent of Australia's population. The highest proportion were born in the UK (5.1%), followed by New Zealand (2.6%), and China (2.0%).5  Immigrant populations generally enjoy better reported health and lower rates of disability and hospitalisation than those reported by people born in Australia.6  Nonetheless, rates of mortality for some diseases are higher in some immigrant groups compared to Australian-born residents, for example, lung cancer in people born in the UK, the Netherlands and Ireland; coronary heart diseases in people born in Poland; and diabetes in those born in Germany, Greece, India, Italy, Lebanon and Poland.7, 8  Participation in preventative health care, such as cancer screening, is also lower among some culturally and linguistically diverse groups.1   

Generally speaking, people born outside of Australia are less likely to be smokers than those born in Australia. Similarly, the prevalence of smoking is higher in English-speaking households compared with those that mainly speak a language other than English (See Chapter 1, Section 1.8). Nonetheless, among some population sub-groups, smoking is much more common. For example, small studies have found that as many as half of men with Chinese or Vietnamese backgrounds in Australia are smokers.9, 10  A study of Arabic-speaking patients seen in the general practice setting in New South Wales found that almost one third were smokers. Smokers were also more likely to report poorer overall health and high nicotine dependence. Nicotine dependence was highest in Arabic-speaking males.11  A study of Australians over 45 found that compared with Australian-born men, a higher proportion of men born in Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East were current smokers. Compared with Australian-born women, a lower proportion of women from East and Southeast Asia were current smokers and a higher proportion of women from New Zealand and the UK/Ireland were current smokers.12  Smoking rates among women immigrants from non-Western countries (where smoking is typically rare) may also increase as they acculturate and adopt new social norms.13  Morbidity and mortality from smoking-related diseases can therefore disproportionately affect culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) populations.14 

Among children, a Canadian study of overseas-born children found that the likelihood of smoking increased with the years spent living in Canada.15  A similar finding was made in the US, where the odds of ever use of tobacco among Hmong American youth increased the longer they had spent living in the US.16  In Australia, the risk of smoking appears to increase among women born in Asia the younger they had migrated.12

People from cultural backgrounds where smoking is highly prevalent may face cultural resistance and unique barriers to quitting.17, 18  Providing education and support to Australians with different cultural backgrounds provides particular challenges for public health policy.19  For an overview of cessation interventions for people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds, see Section 7.19.7.

9.6.3 Lone parents, especially lone mothers

The prevalence of smoking in single-parent households is significantly higher than among those with two parents, with single mother families making up the vast majority of one parent families. (See Chapter 1, Section 1.10.3.)  Lone mothers and their children are one of the most disadvantaged groups in many countries20  and suffer higher risks of poverty and ill-health than other family structures.21, 22  Lone parents tend to have higher levels of unemployment, in part due to caring responsibilities, and are more likely to experience financial hardship.23, 24

In Australia in 2009–10, three in five (59%) lone parent households with dependent children were classified as having ‘low economic resources’. One-parent households accounted for 6% of all households, but comprised 18% of low economic resource households.25  In the same year, expenditure on tobacco products in single parent households with dependent children was on average $16.83 per week.26  In comparison, coupled households with dependent children spent $11.86 per week.26

Australian research conducted in the early 2000s found that almost half (46%) of lone mothers reported smoking, with those younger in age (18–29 years) reporting the highest prevalence (59%).27  Lone mothers who were younger, less educated, received government pension/benefits, occupied rental housing, or who lived in more disadvantaged areas were more likely to smoke than others. A strong ‘lone mother effect’ remained after controlling for socio-economic variables. The odds of smoking for lone mothers were 2.4 times greater than for married mothers and twice as large as those for women living alone.28   Smoking among lone mothers is associated both with present29  and long-term challenges caused by disadvantage.2130-36  Poorer coping styles and self-blame are also associated with higher rates of smoking among this group.37

Lone mothers are much less likely than mothers with partners to quit smoking during pregnancy. Further, mothers who continue to smoke during pregnancy are more likely to report having a difficult, fussy baby, adding to the stress of child raising without a partner present.38, 39   

In 2013, the National Drug Strategy Household Survey reported current smoking prevalence in single-parent households with dependent children was 33.2%, more than double the prevalence in coupled households with dependent children (14%). Lone parent households also reported higher consumption, with an average of 105 cigarettes smoked per week, compared to an average of 87 cigarettes per week in coupled households with children.40 

Australian research found that between 2001 and 2010, the proportion of households containing a smoker and a child under the age of 15 declined both in lone parent households and households headed by a couple. However the decline was more profound in two-parent households, with about half of lone-parent households with dependent children still smoking in 2010. Lone-parent households with dependent children had a greater percentage increase between 2001 and 2010 in only smoking outdoors while at home, compared with two-parent smoking households. However, lone-parent households were still half as likely to smoke only outdoors as two-parent households.41   

Table 9.6.1
Prevalence of smoking in households containing a child under the age of 15 overall and according to household structure, 2001–10

Source: Gartner and Hall (2012)41

* Result should be interpreted with caution as Relative Standard Error lies between 25% and 50%.

Children who live in households with a smoker suffer more often and more severely from respiratory diseases.42, 43  Children of lone parents who smoke are also much more likely than children in two-parent families (and than children of lone parents who do not smoke) to begin smoking as teenagers,44-46  therefore smoking can lead to multiple generations of health and social disadvantage.

9.6.4 People with mental and substance use disorders

Mental and substance use disorders are the third leading ‘broad cause’ of Australia’s disease burden, behind cancer and cardiovascular disease.47 The 2007 National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing reported that 45% of Australians aged 16–85 will experience a high prevalence mental disorder, such as depression, anxiety, or a substance use disorder in their lifetime.8  Compared with the general population, people with mental illness have higher smoking rates, higher levels of nicotine dependence, and a disproportionate health and financial burden from smoking.48, 49  In Australia in 2013, daily smokers were twice as likely to have high/very high levels of psychological distress compared with people who had never smoked (18.2% compared with 9.0%, respectively) and were twice as likely to have been diagnosed or treated for a mental health condition (22% compared with 11%).50

Smokers with co-occurring mental illness or substance use disorders have limited access to cessation treatment, longer durations of smoking, and lower rates of quitting. They also have shortened life expectancies, largely due to smoking-related disease; such smokers are far more likely to die from their smoking than as a result of their psychiatric condition.48, 51  People with mental illness and mental health workers often perceive smoking to be helpful in relieving or managing psychiatric symptoms.52, 53  However, recent evidence suggests that the reverse is true; quitting smoking for at least six weeks actually improves mental health, mood, and quality of life, both among the general population and among people with a psychiatric disorder.52   

Smoking can also exacerbate financial stress among people with mental illness. In Australia in 2000, it was estimated that people with a psychotic illness who smoked and were in receipt of a disability support pension spent more than one-third of their pension on tobacco products. Smoking plays an important role in the cycle of poverty and disadvantage experienced by people with mental illness.54

Chapter 7, Section 12 provides a detailed overview of smoking and mental health, including prevalence, factors influencing uptake and barriers to quitting, cessation interventions, and the role of health professionals. 

9.6.5 The homeless

Homelessness is defined as lacking adequate access to safe and secure housing. In 2010, 1.1 million Australian adults (7% of the 16.8 million adult population living in private dwellings) had experienced homelessness at some time in the previous 10 years. They were mostly younger adults (18–34 years) who had lower levels of education, were more likely to have been unemployed in this period, derived their main income from government pensions or allowance and had experienced financial stress compared to those who had not been homeless. They were also more likely to report disability or a long-term health condition. Reports of psychological disability or restriction in the homeless were four-fold compared to those who had never been homeless (22% compared to 5%).25

Individuals experiencing homelessness have a poorer health status than the general population, with the ‘street homeless’ (those usually dwelling on streets or in parks, in derelict buildings or other temporary shelters) being the worst affected.55  Melbourne-based research has shown a greatly elevated prevalence of smoking among the homeless (77%), with street homeless reporting higher rates of 93%.55

For a detailed overview of smoking among homeless people and targeted cessation interventions, see Chapter 7, Section 7.19.3.

9.6.6 Prison populations

In June 2015, there were just over 36,000 adult prisoners in Australia, 92 per cent of whom were men.56  The prevalence of smoking in the prison population has traditionally been far higher than among the general population,57, 58  with tobacco use commonly accepted as part of prison life.58 In Australia in 2015, about three-quarters of prison entrants aged 18–44 were daily smokers.59  The average age at which prison entrants had their first cigarette was 14,59  compared with 16 in the general population.40  One explanation for the very high rates of smoking among prisoners is that priority populations who have much higher smoking prevalence than the general population, such as those from socially disadvantaged backgrounds, those with a history of mental illness and substance abuse, and those from Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander backgrounds, are substantially overrepresented in Australian prisons.57-59   In 2015, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander prisoners accounted for just over a quarter of the total prisoner population (while only comprising two per cent of the Australian population).56

Factors within the prison environment that may increase prisoners’ likelihood of smoking include stress, boredom, lack of social support, high smoking rates among prisoners and staff, shared cells, relationship building between prisoners, and the use of tobacco as currency.60  One study found an association between heavy smoking among prisoners and past adverse childhood events and personality traits, such as impulsivity, among prisoners.61  Illicit drug use can also relate to tobacco use, with a NSW study finding that about 90% of individuals who had ever injected drugs, or used cannabis, were smokers as well.58  Similarly, a 2008 study of prisoners in three metropolitan intake prisons in Adelaide found many prisoners used multiple substances, with the six most common substances used at high and moderate risk levels being tobacco, cannabis, amphetamines, opiates, alcohol and sedatives. Of these, tobacco was the mostly commonly used substance among male and female prisoners.62   

Prisoners experience poorer physical and mental health than the general population. In 2015, almost one-third (30%) of entrants reported a long-term health condition or disability that limited their daily activities and/or affected their participation in education or employment. A similar proportion (32%) reported having a chronic condition. Smoking-related illnesses such as asthma, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and cancer were among the most common conditions. Almost one-quarter (23%) of entrants reported ever having been diagnosed with asthma, compared with 10 per cent of the general population. About half (49%) of entrants reported ever having been told they have a mental health disorder, including alcohol and drug misuse.59   

As at November 2016, all Australian territories and states (except Western Australia) have introduced or announced intentions to introduce complete smoking bans in prisons. Such bans lead to a clear reduction in smoking among dischargees, which may flow through to the community.14  See Chapter 7, Section 7.19.10 for a discussion of smoking bans and other cessation interventions among prison populations. 

9.6.7 Military personnel and veterans 

Military personnel are more likely to smoke, and to smoke more heavily, than civilians.6364-6566  Australian research published in 2010 found that the highest prevalence of current smoking in the Australian Defence Force was among individuals with lower levels of education and those serving in the Navy (26%). The percentage of current smokers in the Army was 22% and the lowest prevalence of smokers was in the Air Force (8%).67  Based on the relative incidence of smoking-related cancers, smoking rates among veterans of the Korean war are believed to be higher than those of the general population.68  Tobacco use has traditionally been a part of defence force culture, with tobacco being provided and promoted to troops.69-72   

Stress and trauma associated with war deployment is associated with the uptake of smoking, relapse, and overall high rates of smoking compared to the general population.73-75  The misperception that tobacco is effective for stress relief is pervasive among military personnel, including leaders.76  A study of returned veterans from the Iraq and Afghanistan wars indicated an association between heavy daily smoking and emotional numbing, suggesting that veterans suffering post-traumatic stress may smoke in an attempt to manage their trauma.77  US research has found that deployment with combat experience predicted higher smoking initiation and relapse rate among military personnel. Previous mental health disorders, life stressors, and other military and non-military characteristics also predicted initiation and relapse.78  Smoking is also associated with pain79  and alcohol use75 among veterans. 

Veterans report poorer health and wellbeing than the general community. A 2006 survey of Australia’s Department of Veterans’ Affairs community found that older clients (65 years plus) were less likely to rate their health as very good or excellent compared with general community aged 65 or over (21% compared to 36%). Among the younger clients, the difference was much more marked, with only 10% of veterans reporting their health as very good or excellent, compared to over 60% in general population aged 45 years and under. In 2009, 50,000 Department of Veterans’ Affairs clients had accepted one or more mental health disability claims associated with their participation in war or defence service. The most common conditions were post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, substance abuse, and depression.8  One study of Australian Army Vietnam veterans concluded that the increased risk of mortality among these veterans is likely to be attributable to health-risk behaviours such as smoking, inactivity, and poor diet, rather than from war service per se or psychiatric disorder.80  Scottish research found an increased risk of smoking-related cancer compared with non-veterans among older veterans.63

Studies of US war veterans have concluded that additional effort is required to support smoking cessation in this community of particularly high smoking prevalence.656681  Despite its longstanding role within military culture, there have been increasing efforts in recent years to implement tobacco control policies and cessation programs within the military. Strong policies and support by leaders appear crucial to the success of such interventions.82  For an overview of cessation interventions for veteran populations, see Chapter 7, Section 7.19.11.    

Recent news and research

For recent news items and research on this topic, click here (Last updated February 2017)




1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Australia’s health 2016. Australia’s health series no. 15. Cat. no. AUS 199. Canberra: AIHW; 2016. Available from: http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=60129555544 .

2. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 4364.0.55.001–National Health Survey: First results, 2014–15  2016. Available from: http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4364.0.55.001Main+Features100012014-15?OpenDocument

3. Standing Council on Health. National strategic framework for rural and remote health. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2012. Available from: http://www.ruralhealthaustralia.gov.au/ .

4. Intergovernmental Committee on Drugs, National Tobacco Strategy 2012–2018. Commonwealth of Australia; 2012. Available from: http://www.nationaldrugstrategy.gov.au/internet/drugstrategy/publishing.nsf/Content/national_ts_2012_2018 .

5. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 3412.0 - Migration, Australia, 2014-15: ABS, 2016. Available from: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/lookup/3412.0Media%20Release12014-15 .

6. Singh M and de Looper M. Australian health inequalities: Birthplace. AIHW bulletin no. 2.Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2002. Available from: http://www.aihw.gov.au/publications/index.cfm/title/7722 .

7. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. AIHW national mortality database. Canberra: AIHW, 2011. Viewed:  Available from: http://www.aihw.gov.au/aihw-national-mortality-database/ .

8. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia's health 2010. Australia's health series, no. 12, AIHW cat. no. AUS 122.Canberra: AIHW, 2010. Available from: http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=6442468376&tab=2 .

9. Rissel C, McLellan L, and Bauman A. Factors associated with delayed tobacco uptake among Vietnamese/Asian and Arabic youth in Sydney, NSW. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 2000; 24(1):22–8. Available from: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/119012648/abstract

10. Jiang W, Leung B, Tam N, Xu H, Gleeson S, et al. Smoking status and associated factors among male Chinese restaurant workers in metropolitan Sydney. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 2016. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27324668

11. Girgis S, Adily A, Velasco M, Garden F, Zwar N, et al. Smoking patterns and readiness to quit - a study of the Australian Arabic community. Australian Family Physician, 2009; 38(3):154–61. Available from: http://www.racgp.org.au/afp/200903/30559

12. Weber M, Banks E, and Sitas F. Smoking in migrants in New South Wales, Australia: Report on data from over 100 000 participants in the 45 and up study. Drug and Alcohol Review, 2011; 30(6):597−605. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1465-3362.2010.00247.x/full

13. Reiss K, Lehnhardt J, and Razum O. Factors associated with smoking in immigrants from non-western to western countries - what role does acculturation play? A systematic review. Tobacco Induced Diseases, 2015; 13(1):11. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25908932

14. Liu JJ, Wabnitz C, Davidson E, Bhopal RS, White M, et al. Smoking cessation interventions for ethnic minority groups--a systematic review of adapted interventions. Preventive Medicine, 2013; 57(6):765–75. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24076130

15. O'Loughlin J, Maximova K, Fraser K, and Gray-Donald K. Does the "healthy immigrant effect" extend to smoking in immigrant children? The Journal of Adolescent Health, 2010; 46(3):299–301. Available from: http://www.jahonline.org/article/PIIS1054139X09003322/fulltext

16. Rooney B, Choudhary R, and Bliss A. Social determinants of smoking among Hmong Americans residing in Wisconsin. Wisconsin Medical Journal, 2009; 108(9):439–46. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20131685

17. Jukic A, Pino N, and Flaherty B. Alcohol and other drug use, attitudes and knowledge amongst Arabic speakers in Sydney. DAMEC, 1996. Available from: http://catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/1104884 .

18. Phillips A, Monaem A, and Newman C. A qualitative study of smoking within a Western Sydney Arabic-speaking community: A focus on men in the context of their families. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 2015. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25798526

19. Commonwealth of Australia. National tobacco campaign: Targeting high-need and hard to reach groups. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, 2010. Last update: Viewed 29 April. Available from: http://www.yourhealth.gov.au/internet/yourhealth/publishing.nsf/Content/factsheet-prevention-03#1.

20. Jun H and Acevedo-Garcia D. The effect of single motherhood on smoking by socioeconomic status and race/ethnicity. Social Science & Medicine, 2007; 65(4):653–66. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17493724

21. Graham H. When life's a drag: Women, smoking and disadvantage,  Department of Health, Editor London, UK: HMSO; 1993.  Available from: http://www.lib.muohio.edu/multifacet/record/mu3ugb2332484.

22. Dorsett R and Marsh A, The health trap: Poverty, smoking and lone parenthood. London: Policy Studies Institute; 1998. Available from: http://www.psi.org.uk/site/publication_detail/1286 .

23. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 1370.0 − measures of Australia's progress, 2010. Canberra: ABS, 2010. Available from: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/1370.0 .

24. Rahkonen O, Laaksonsen M, and Karvonen S. The contribution of lone parenthood and economic difficulties to smoking. Social Science & Medicine, 2005; 61:211–6. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15847973

25. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 4102.0 − Australian social trends, March quarter, 2012. Canberra: ABS, 2012. Available from: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/4102.0 .

26. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 6503.0 household expenditure survey and survey of income and housing: Summary of results, 2009−10. Canberra: ABS, 2011. Available from: http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/6530.02009-10?OpenDocument .

27. Siahpush M, Borland R, and Scollo M. Prevalence and socio-economic correlates of smoking among lone mothers in Australia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 2002; 26(2):132–5. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12054331

28. Siahpush M. Why is lone motherhood so strongly associated with smoking in Australia? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 2004; 28(1):37–42. Available from: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118803451/abstract

29. Dejin-Karlsson E, Hanson BS, Ostergren PO, Ranstam J, Isacsson SO, et al. Psychosocial resources and persistent smoking in early pregnancy−a population study of women in their first pregnancy in Sweden. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1996; 50(1):33–9. Available from: http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/50/1/33   

30. Graham H, Inskip HM, Francis B, and Harman J. Pathways of disadvantage and smoking careers: Evidence and policy implications. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2006; 60(suppl. 2):S7–12. Available from: http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/60/suppl_2/ii7

31. Graham H. Gender and class dimensions of smoking behaviour in Britain: Insights from a survey of mothers. Social Science & Medicine, 1994; 38(5):691–8. Available from: http://journals.elsevierhealth.com/periodicals/ymai/medline/record/MDLN.8171347

32. Graham H. Cigarette smoking; a light on gender and class inequality in Britain. Journal of Social Policy, 1995; 24(3):509–27. Available from: http://journals.cambridge.org/article_S0047279400025411

33. Graham H. Smoking prevalence among women in the European community 1950-1990. Social Science & Medicine, 1996; 43(2):243–54. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8844928

34. Graham H. Social determinants and their unequal distribution: Clarifying policy understandings. The Milbank Quarterly, 2004; 82(1):101–24. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15016245

35. Jefferis B, Power C, Graham H, and al E. Effects of childhood socio-economic circumstances of persistent smoking. American Journal of Public Health, 2004; 94(2):279–85. Available from: http://www.ajph.org/cgi/content/abstract/94/2/279?etoc

36. Graham H. Tackling inequalities in health in England: Remedying health disadvantages, narrowing health gaps or reducing health gradients. Journal of Social Policy, 2004; 33:115–31. Available from: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=198421

37. Sperlich S and Maina MN. Are single mothers' higher smoking rates mediated by dysfunctional coping styles? BMC Womens Health, 2014; 14:124. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25300712

38. Pickett K, Wood C, Adamson J, D'Souza L, and Wakschlag L. Meaningful differences in maternal smoking behaviour during pregnancy: Implications for infant behavioural vulnerability. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2008; 62(4):318–24. Available from: http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/62/4/318

39. Gaffney K, Beckwitt A, and Friesen M. Mothers' reflections about infant irritability and postpartum tobacco use. Birth, 2008; 35(1):66−72. Available from: http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00212.x

40. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, National Drug Strategy Household Survey detailed report: 2013. Supplementary tables. Canberra: AIHW; 2014. Available from: http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=60129549469&tab=3 .

41. Gartner CE and Hall WD. Is the socioeconomic gap in childhood exposure to secondhand smoke widening or narrowing? Tobacco Control, 2013; 22(5):344–8. Available from: http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/early/2012/03/29/tobaccocontrol-2011-050297.abstract   

42. Trinder PM, Croft PR, and Lewis M. Social class, smoking and the severity of respiratory symptoms in the general population. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2000; 54(5):340–3. Available from: http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/54/5/340 

43. Spencer N. Maternal education, lone parenthood, material hardship, maternal smoking, and longstanding respiratory problems in childhood: Testing a hierarchical conceptual framework. Journal of  Epidemiology and Community Health, 2005; 59(10):842–6. Available from: http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/59/10/842   

44. White V and Hayman J. Smoking behaviours of Australian secondary school students in 2002. National Drug Strategy monograph series no. 54, Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, 2004. Available from: http://www.nationaldrugstrategy.gov.au/internet/drugstrategy/publishing.nsf/content/mono54 .

45. White V and Hayman J. Smoking behaviours of Australian secondary students in 2005. National Drug Strategy monograph series no. 59, Canberra: Drug Strategy Branch, Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, 2006. Available from: http://www.nationaldrugstrategy.gov.au/internet/drugstrategy/publishing.nsf/Content/mono59 .

46. Francesconi M, Jenkins S, and Siedler T. The effect of lone motherhood on the smoking behavior of young adults. Health Economics, 2010; 19(11):1377–84. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hec.1555/pdf

47. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australian Burden of Disease study: Impact and causes of illness and death in Australia 2011. Australian Burden of Disease Study series no. 3., BOD 4. Canberra: AIHW, 2016. Available from: http://www.aihw.gov.au/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=60129555476 .

48. Williams JM, Steinberg ML, Griffiths KG, and Cooperman N. The need for smokers with behavioral health comorbidity to be designated as a tobacco use disparity group. American Journal of Public Health, 2013; 103(9):1549–55. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3776478/

49. Forman-Hoffman VL, Hedden SL, Glasheen C, Davies C, and Colpe LJ. The role of mental illness on cigarette dependence and successful quitting in a nationally representative, household-based sample of US adults. Annals of Epidemiology, 2016. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27247163

50. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. National Drug Strategy Household Survey detailed report: 2013. Cat. no. PHE 183 Canberra: AIHW, 2014. Available from: http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=60129549469&tab=3.

51. Lawrence D, Hancock KJ, and Kisely S. The gap in life expectancy from preventable physical illness in psychiatric patients in Western Australia: Retrospective analysis of population based registers. British Medical Journal, 2013; 346. Available from: http://www.bmj.com/bmj/346/bmj.f2539.full.pdf

52. Taylor G, McNeill A, Girling A, Farley A, Lindson-Hawley N, et al. Change in mental health after smoking cessation: Systematic review and meta-analysis. British Medical Journal, 2014; 348:g1151. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24524926

53. Mendelsohn CP, Kirby DP, and Castle DJ. Smoking and mental illness. An update for psychiatrists. Australas Psychiatry, 2015; 23(1):37–43. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25512967

54. Lawn S. Australians with mental illness who smoke. British Journal of Psychiatry, 2001; 178(1):85. Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1471-2458-5-138.pdf

55. Kermode M, Crofts N, Miller P, Speed B, and Streeton J. Health indicators and risks among people experiencing homelessness in Melbourne, 1995−1996. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 1998; 22(4):464–70. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9659774

56. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 4517.0–prisoners in Australia 2015. Available from: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/by%20Subject/4517.0~2015~Main%20Features~Key%20findings~1 .

57. Awofeso N, Testaz R, Wyper S, and Morris S. Smoking prevalence in New South Wales correctional facilities. Tobacco Control, 2001; 10(1):84–5. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1763990/

58. Belcher J, Butler T, Richmond R, Wodak A, and Wilhelm K. Smoking and its correlates in an Australian prisoner population. Drug and Alcohol Review, 2006; 25(4):343–8. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16854660

59. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, The health of Australia's prisoners 2015. Cat. no. PHE 207. Canberra: AIHW; 2015. Available from: http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=60129553527 .

60. Mackay A. Stubbing out smoking in prisons: Bans are an ineffective mechanism. Alternative Law Journal, 2014; 39(2):99–103. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/alterlj39&div=28&id=&page=

61. Papadodima S, Sakelliadis E, Sergentanis T, Giotakos O, Sergentanis I, et al. Smoking in prison: A hierarchical approach at the crossroad of personality and childhood events. European Journal of Public Health, 2009; 20(4):470–4. Available from: http://eurpub.oxfordjournals.org/content/20/4/470.long

62. Holmwood C, Marriott M, and Humeniuk R. Substance use patterns in newly admitted male and female South Australian prisoners using the who-assist (alcohol, smoking and substance involvement screening test). International Journal of Prisoner Health, 2008; 4(4):198–207. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19061062

63. Bergman BP, Mackay DF, Morrison D, and Pell JP. Smoking-related cancer in military veterans: Retrospective cohort study of 57,000 veterans and 173,000 matched non-veterans. BMC Cancer, 2016; 16:311. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27178424

64. Haddock CK, Klesges RC, Talcott GW, Lando H, and Stein RJ. Smoking prevalence and risk factors for smoking in a population of United States air force basic trainees. Tobacco Control, 1998; 7(3):232–5. Available from: http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/7/3/232 

65. Brown D. Smoking prevalence among US veterans. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2009; 25(2):147–9. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19894079

66. Bastian L and Sherman S. Effects of the wars on smoking among veterans. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2010; 25(2):102–3. Available from:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20077050 

67. Barton CA, McGuire A, Waller M, Treloar SA, McClintock C, et al. Smoking prevalence, its determinants and short-term health implications in the Australian defence force. Military Medicine, 2010; 175(4):267–72. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20446502

68. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Cancer incidence study 2003: Australian veterans of the Korean war. AIHW cat. no. PHE 48.Canberra: AIHW, 2003. Available from: http://www.aihw.gov.au/publications/index.cfm/title/9589 .

69. Smith E and Malone R. 'Everywhere the soldier will be': Wartime tobacco promotion in the US military. American Journal of Public Health, 2009; 99(9):1595–602. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2724442/pdf/nihms155182.pdf

70. Smith E and Malone R. Tobacco promotion to military personnel: 'The plums are here to be plucked'. Military Medicine, 2009; 174(8):797–806. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19743733

71. Nelson JP, Pederson LL, and Lewis J. Tobacco use in the army: Illuminating patterns, practices, and options for treatment. Military Medicine, 2009; 174(2):162–9. Available from: http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA521868

72. Nelson J and Pederson L. Military tobacco use: A synthesis of the literature on prevalence, factors related to use, and cessation interventions. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 2008; 10(5):775–90. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18569751

73. Smith B, Ryan M, Wingard D, Patterson T, Slymen D, et al. Cigarette smoking and military deployment: A prospective evaluation. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2008; 35(6):539–46. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18842388

74. Poston WSC, Taylor JE, Hoffman KM, Peterson AL, Lando HA, et al. Smoking and deployment: Perspectives of junior-enlisted US air force and US army personnel and their supervisors. Military Medicine, 2008; 173(5):441–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18543564

75. Harte CB, Proctor SP, and Vasterling JJ. Prospective examination of cigarette smoking among Iraq-deployed and nondeployed soldiers: Prevalence and predictive characteristics. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 2014; 48(1):38–49. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24474618

76. Smith EA and Malone RE. Mediatory myths in the US military: Tobacco use as 'stress relief'. American Journal of Health Promotion, 2014; 29(2):115–22. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24359178

77. Cook J, Jakupcak M, Rosenheck R, Fontana A, and McFall M. Influence of PTSD symptom clusters on smoking status among help-seeking Iraq and Afghanistan veterans. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 2009; 11(10):1189–95. Available from: http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/content/11/10/1189.long

78. Boyko EJ, Trone DW, Peterson AV, Jacobson IG, Littman AJ, et al. Longitudinal investigation of smoking initiation and relapse among younger and older US military personnel. American Journal of Public Health, 2015:e1–e10. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25880953

79. Chapman SL and Wu LT. Associations between cigarette smoking and pain among veterans. Epidemiologic Reviews, 2015; 37(1):86–102. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25595170

80. O'Toole B, Catts S, Outram S, Pierse K, and Cockburn J. Factors associated with civilian mortality in Australian Vietnam veterans three decades after the war. Military Medicine, 2010; 175(2):88–95. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20180477

81. Hamlett-Berry K, Davison J, Kivlahan D, Matthews M, Hendrickson J, et al. Evidence-based national initiatives to address tobacco use as a public health priority in the veterans health administration. Military Medicine, 2009; 174(1):29–34. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19216295

82. Smith EA, Poston WS, Haddock CK, and Malone RE. Installation tobacco control programs in the US military. Military Medicine, 2016; 181(6):596–601. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27244072




      Previous Chapter Next Chapter