9A.2 Culturally and linguistically diverse groups

Last update:  April 2022

Suggested citation: Greenhalgh, EM, & Scollo, MM. 9.A.2 Culturally and linguistically diverse groups. In Greenhalgh, EM, Scollo, MM and Winstanley, MH [editors]. Tobacco in Australia: Facts and issues. Melbourne: Cancer Council Victoria; 2022. Available from: http://www.tobaccoinaustralia.org.au/chapter-9-disadvantage/in-depth/9a-2-culturally-and-linguistically-diverse-groups

9A.2.1 Trends in the prevalence of smoking

According to the 2016 Census, over one quarter (28.5%) of Australian residents were born overseas,1 and more than one-fifth (21%) of Australians spoke a language other than English at home.2  Australia’s is one of the most culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) populations in the world. Among the top 10 migrants’ countries that came to Australia in 2020, seven were non-English speaking, and six were from South and Southeast Asia.3

Generally speaking, people born outside of Australia are less likely to be smokers than those born in Australia. Similarly, the prevalence of smoking is higher in English-speaking households compared with those that mainly speak a language other than English. However, there is considerable variation in prevalence of smoking among individuals born in different countries who have migrated to Australia.4 Smoking rates in 2019 among those 14 years older born in each of several major regions of the world are set out in Table 9A.2.1.

Table 9A.2.1
Tobacco smoking status, people aged 14 years and older, by country of birth and language spoken at home, 2019 (per cent)

* Never smoked more than 100 cigarettes (manufactured or roll-your own) or the equivalent amount of tobacco.

† Smoked 100 cigarettes (manufactured and/or roll-your-own) or the equivalent amount of tobacco and reports no longer smoking

‡ Smoked daily, weekly or less than weekly

Source: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Data tables: National Drug Strategy Household Survey 2019 - 8 Priority population groups supplementary tables, Tables 8.17 Country of birth and 8.19 Language spoken at home. Canberra: AIHW, 2020. Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/illicit-use-of-drugs/national-drug-strategy-household-survey-2019/data.

 

It is important to note that in some of these regions, the prevalence of smoking is substantially higher among men than women. As well as concealing sex differences, the regional summaries provided in Table 1.8.1 are likely to disguise higher smoking rates within some smaller population sub-groups.5 For example, small studies have found that as many as half of men with Chinese or Vietnamese backgrounds in Sydney were smokers at the time the surveys were conducted.6, 7 A study of Arabic-speaking patients seen in the general practice setting in New South Wales found that almost one-third were smokers. Smokers were also more likely to report poorer overall health and high nicotine dependence. Nicotine dependence was highest in Arabic-speaking males.8 A study of Australians over 45 found that compared with Australian-born men, a higher proportion of men born in Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East were current smokers.9 Earlier research found that Vietnamese men, Pasifika men and women, and Italian men reported higher smoking prevalence than the overall Australian population.10 Compared with Australian-born women, a lower proportion of women from East and Southeast Asia aged over 45 were current smokers and a higher proportion of women from New Zealand and the UK/Ireland were current smokers.9

Although adult prevalence of smoking is higher in some groups with a non-English speaking background, studies from New South Wales have consistently shown that children within these families have a lower prevalence of smoking than their counterparts from English-speaking homes.6, 11, 12

Table 9A.2.2 sets out data on regular (daily or weekly) smoking for Australians 18+ from each of the National Drug Strategy Household Surveys between 2001 and 2019. Analysis of this data indicates that in 2019, ‘New Zealand and Oceania’ (16%; comprising New Zealand, Melanesia, Micronesia and Polynesia, but excluding Hawaii13) followed by ‘North Africa and the Middle East’ (13%) were the regions with highest prevalence of regular smoking. In each of the survey years from 2004 to 2019, people who were born outside Australia were significantly less likely to be regular smokers than those born in Australia (controlling for age and sex). In 2001, there was no significant difference between groups. In all years, the prevalence of smoking was significantly higher in households in which the main language spoken at home was English, compared with those who mainly spoke a language other than English at home (again controlling for age and sex).

Table 9A.2.2
Regular smoking among persons aged 18 years and over, by country of birth and main language spoken at home, 2001, 2004, 2007, 2010, 2013, 2016, and 2019

* Includes those reporting that they smoke ‘daily’ or ‘at least weekly’.

† Includes persons smoking any combination of cigarettes, pipes or cigars.

‡ Note: Further data on country of birth not supplied in 2010.

^ Sub-Saharan Africa not included as a category pre-2013.

Note: All data weighted to the Australian population appropriate for each survey year and may vary slightly from data presented in previous edition.

Source: National Drug Strategy Household Survey for 200114, 200415, 200716, 201017, 201318, 201619 and 201920

9A.2.2 Contribution of smoking to health outcomes and social inequality

Immigrant populations generally enjoy better reported health and lower rates of disability and hospitalisation than those reported by people born in Australia.21 Lower rates of smoking, healthier diets, fewer sedentary hours, and the greater likelihood of migration among those with greater means and health can help explain these patterns.22 However, as noted above, these generalisations can mask higher rates of morbidity and mortality from smoking-related diseases among specific culturally and linguistically diverse populations that have higher smoking rates.23 For example, Australian research has found that while immigrants from English speaking countries had better physical health than native-born people, those from non-English speaking countries had typically poorer physical and mental health outcomes.24 Participation in preventative health care, such as cancer screening, is also lower among some culturally and linguistically diverse groups,25 and some groups can face substantial barriers to accessing health services.3 Further, the greater health experienced by migrants can diminish over time, with one longitudinal study showing convergence between immigrants and those born in Australia in terms of reporting a chronic condition and number of chronic conditions after 20 years of residence in Australia.26

9A.2.3 Explanations for higher smoking prevalence

People from cultural backgrounds where smoking is highly prevalent may continue to smoke at much higher rates than the general population in their new country. Cultural and social norms, experiences of discrimination, and resettlement stress related to schooling, employment, and absence of social networks, can help to maintain smoking among ethnically diverse groups and immigrant populations.27, 28 Sociodemographic factors that can predict smoking among the general population, such as low education and income, may be less important than cultural factors among immigrant populations.29 Use of tobacco products can promote feelings of belonging and cultural identity,30 and smoking may be perceived as an enjoyable and important part of life.31 Interviews with Chinese speakers in Canada highlighted the common practice of offering and sharing cigarettes as a sign of respect and to facilitate socialisation.32 Smoking may also be tied to ideas of masculinity among men in many CALD groups in Australia.31, 33

Conversely, people from countries with very low smoking prevalence may face increased risk of taking up smoking as they adopt the norms of their new country. Smoking rates among women immigrants from non-Western countries (where smoking is typically rare) may increase as they acculturate and adopt new social norms.34 A Canadian study of overseas-born children found that the likelihood of smoking increased with the years spent living in Canada.35 A similar finding was made in the US, where the odds of ever use of tobacco among Hmong American youth increased the longer they had spent living in the US.36 In Australia, the risk of smoking appears to increase among women born in Asia the younger they had migrated.9 Another Australian study found that smoking prevalence among immigrants from non-English speaking countries, who had lower odds of smoking, converged towards the native-born after 20 years of living in Australia. The effect was stronger again among those who had arrived in Australia as a child or teenager.37

Providing education and support to Australians from diverse cultural backgrounds is an essential component of public health programs in Australia:38 some groups of smokers may be more difficult to reach with tobacco control campaigns and other strategies.5 For example, there has traditionally been a lack of culturally relevant anti-smoking campaigns.31 People from cultural backgrounds where smoking is highly prevalent may face cultural resistance and unique barriers to quitting,39, 40 such as a lack of awareness of or access to healthcare and cessation support, and scepticism about the effectiveness of interventions.41 The role of willpower in quitting is often emphasised,31, 33, 42 with relatively low use of pharmacotherapies for quitting.43 Patterns of tobacco use and types of products used can differ between groups; for example, waterpipe use is highly prevalence among Arabic- and Hindi-speaking communities.30, 31 Each of these factors necessitates tailored and targeted cessation interventions.

9A.2.4 Interventions for reducing smoking

Interventions for culturally and linguistically diverse smokers should consider their unique patterns of risk and protective factors, as well as other potentially relevant dimensions such as values, beliefs and practices.23, 44 Qualitative research in Sydney found that among Arabic speakers, male smoking was normalised in home, social and religious settings. While there was concern about children's exposure to secondhand smoke, there was less concern for adults, particularly wives. Smoking created conflict within families, and attempts to quit were often unassisted. There was a lack of enthusiasm for telephone support services, however participants suggested that free NRT and programs in religious settings might be useful strategies.40 Another Australian study found that despite high rates of smoking among Arabic-speaking communities, its social acceptability is declining due to health and financial impacts, and preventing use among young people is prioritised.33 Interviews with CALD groups in NSW similarly found that the high cost of cigarettes, health effects, and social stigma were cited as reasons for disliking smoking, though few participants felt an urgency to quit.31

A systematic review of adapted cessation interventions for ‘ethnic minority groups’ found that while such interventions are more acceptable, this does not translate into improvements in smoking cessation outcomes.23 Another systematic review reported more promising results for the effectiveness of specific cultural adaptations for cessation, and highlighted that interventions may be more effective if adaptations are implemented as a package, the adaptation includes family level, and where the adaptation results in a higher intensity of the intervention.45 A growing number of more recent studies are examining the effectiveness of interventions that are adapted and tailored based on language and culture, with findings generally showing feasibility and/or effectiveness.46-52 For example, tailored text messaging interventions can allow for broad reach at low cost.53 Building social support, self-efficacy and positive affect may also help to support quit attempts.54, 55 Cultural traditions may also provide unique opportunities to promote quitting; for example, fasting during Ramadan among Muslim smokers, many of whom cut down or temporarily abstain during this time.56-58

Interventions that target products disproportionately used by certain CALD communities, such as waterpipes/shishas, are also needed to reduce tobacco use.30 Waterpipe-specific cessation programs can address unique features of waterpipe smoking (e.g., its cultural significance, social uses, and intermittent use pattern) and characteristics and motivations of users who want to quit.59 A randomised controlled trial concluded that brief behavioural cessation treatment for waterpipe users appears to be feasible and effective.60 A 2015 review of cessation interventions concluded that people who received either behavioural treatment or behavioural treatment plus bupropion were more likely to quit waterpipe smoking at six months follow-up than those who received usual care.61 A subsequent systematic review concluded that there is a lack of evidence of effectiveness for most interventions for waterpipe smoking. Limited evidence supports bupropion/behavioural support and group behavioural support.62 Another review also found that brief interventions and web-based tailored information may increase waterpipe users’ intentions to quit.63 Varenicline does not appear to be effective for daily waterpipe users.64

Community campaigns appear to be effective in promoting quitting among waterpipe users,63 and recognition of the role and the influence of culture and family in smoking and quitting among specific language groups is important when developing anti-smoking campaign messages. Further, research with CALD groups in NSW suggests that messages that focus on the short-term harms of smoking on a person’s finances, children, family and friends may be the most effective.31 Participants in this research also reported that they avoid or cover pack health warnings,31 which is known to be associated with quitting behaviours.65 Healthcare providers can also play an important role in promoting cessation among CALD groups.66 Increasing the use of cessation medications and behavioural counselling may help increase the success of quit attempts,67-69 particularly as some cultural groups lack awareness and use of evidence-based cessation support.43 Researchers examining the effectiveness of cessation aids and strategies may also wish to be cognisant of the traditional underrepresentation of diverse groups, and ensure that recruitment methods are inclusive and effective for CALD smokers.48, 70

Some culturally specific programs have been initiated by various Australian organisations, mostly on a short-term basis.71, 72 The Quitline service provides access to many printed resources in a range of community languages, and callers can request an interpreter.73 However, interviews in NSW found that many CALD smokers were unaware of this service. Further, when shown a Quitline brochure in their language, most participants thought that it was too long and complex and that the content was unclear or irrelevant, though those over the age of 35 responded more favourably.31 There is limited research on the effectiveness of telephone counselling for CALD communities; one Australian study in 2011 found that a telephone support service for Arabic smokers was acceptable, but did not increase abstinence.74 Australian researchers have highlighted that messages targeting CALD groups should highlight the benefits of cessation aids, including Quitline services.31

Relevant news and research

For recent news items and research on this topic, click  here. ( Last updated August 2022)

References

1. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 3412.0 - Migration, Australia, 2015–16. 2016. Available from: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/3412.0 

2. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2016 Census: Multicultural. 2017. Available from: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/lookup/Media%20Release3 

3. Khatri RB and Assefa Y. Access to health services among culturally and linguistically diverse populations in the Australian universal health care system: issues and challenges. BMC Public Health, 2022; 22(1):880. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35505307 

4. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Data tables: National Drug Strategy Household Survey 2019 - 8. Priority population groups supplementary tables. Canberra: AIHW, 2020. Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/illicit-use-of-drugs/national-drug-strategy-household-survey-2019/data 

5. Rowe R, Gavriel Ansara Y, Jaworski A, Higgs P, and Clare PJ. What is the alcohol, tobacco, and other drug prevalence among culturally and linguistically diverse groups in the Australian population? A national study of prevalence, harms, and attitudes. J Ethn Subst Abuse, 2020; 19(1):101–18. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30064336 

6. Rissel C, McLellan L, and Bauman A. Factors associated with delayed tobacco uptake among Vietnamese/Asian and Arabic youth in Sydney, NSW. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 2000; 24(1):22–8. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10777974/ 

7. Jiang W, Leung B, Tam N, Xu H, Gleeson S, et al. Smoking status and associated factors among male Chinese restaurant workers in metropolitan Sydney. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 2017; 28(1):72–6. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27324668 

8. Girgis S, Adily A, Velasco MJ, Garden FL, Zwar NA, et al. Smoking patterns and readiness to quit--a study of the Australian Arabic community. Australian Family Physician, 2009; 38(3):154–61. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19283257 

9. Weber MF, Banks E, and Sitas F. Smoking in migrants in New South Wales, Australia: report on data from over 100 000 participants in The 45 and Up Study. Drug and Alcohol Review, 2011; 30(6):597–605. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21355908 

10. Donato-Hunt C, Munot S, and Copeland J. Alcohol, tobacco and illicit drug use among six culturally diverse communities in Sydney. Drug and Alcohol Review, 2012; 31(7):881–9. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22404499 

11. Tang L, Rissel C, Bauman A, Fay K, Porter S, et al. A longitudinal study of smoking in year 7 and 8 students speaking English or a language other than English at home in Sydney, Australia. Tobacco Control, 1998; 7(1):35–40. Available from: http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/7/1/35 

12. Chen J, Bauman A, Rissel C, Tang K, Forero R, et al. Substance use in high school students in New South Wales, Australia, in relation to language spoken at home. Journal of Adolescent Health, 2000; 26(1):53–63. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10638719/ 

13. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Statistical Concepts Library. Standard Australian Classification of Countries (SACC) 1998. Chapter 2. Main classification structure. Major groups and minor groups. Catalogue 1269.0. . Canberra: AGPS, 1998. Available from: http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/1269.01998?OpenDocument 

14. Australian Institute for Health and Welfare. 2001 National Drug Strategy Household Survey: Detailed findings. . Drug Statistics Series No. 11, Cat. No. PHE 41 Canberra: AIHW, 2002. Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/alcohol-other-drug-treatment-services/2001-ndshs-detailed-findings/contents/table-of-contents 

15. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. 2004 National Drug Strategy Household Survey: detailed findings. Drug strategy series no.16, AIHW cat. no. PHE 66.Canberra: AIHW, 2005. Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/alcohol-other-drug-treatment-services/2004-ndshs-detailed-findings/contents/table-of-contents 

16. Australian Institute for Health and Welfare. 2007 National Drug Strategy Household Survey: Detailed findings. Drug statistics series No. 22, Cat. No. PHE 107 Canberra: AIHW, 2008. Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/illicit-use-of-drugs/2007-nhsds-detailed-findings/contents/table-of-contents 

17. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. 2010 National Drug Strategy Household Survey: survey report. Drug statistics series no. 25, AIHW cat. no. PHE 145.Canberra: AIHW, 2011. Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/illicit-use-of-drugs/ndshs-2010/contents/table-of-contents 

18. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. National Drug Strategy Household Survey, 2013 [computer file], 2015, Australian Data Archive, The Australian National University: Canberra.

19. Australian Institute for Health and Welfare, National Drug Strategy Household Survey, 2016 [computer file]. Canberra: Australian Data Archive, The Australian National University; 2017.

20. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. National Drug Strategy Household Survey, 2019. ADA Dataverse, 2021. Available from: https://dataverse.ada.edu.au/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.26193/WRHDUL 

21. Singh M and de Looper M. Australian health inequalities: birthplace. AIHW Bulletin no 2.Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2002. Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/d99c3ce2-2525-46db-82da-605d16ccf6d9/bulletin02.pdf.aspx?inline=true 

22. Azagba S, Shan L, and Latham K. Assessing trends and healthy migrant paradox in cigarette smoking among U.S. immigrant adults. Preventive Medicine, 2019; 129:105830. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31521621 

23. Liu JJ, Wabnitz C, Davidson E, Bhopal RS, White M, et al. Smoking cessation interventions for ethnic minority groups--a systematic review of adapted interventions. Preventive Medicine, 2013; 57(6):765–75. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24076130 

24. Jatrana S, Richardson K, and Pasupuleti SSR. Investigating the dynamics of migration and health in Australia: A longitudinal study. Eur J Popul, 2018; 34(4):519–65. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30976253 

25. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Australia’s health 2016. Australia’s health series no. 15. Cat. no. AUS 199. Canberra: AIHW; 2016. Available from: http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=60129555544 

26. Jatrana S, Pasupuleti SS, and Richardson K. Nativity, duration of residence and chronic health conditions in Australia: do trends converge towards the native-born population? Social Science & Medicine, 2014; 119:53–63. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25150651 

27. Oda A, Beukeboom C, Bridekirk J, Bayoumi A, Hynie M, et al. Examining trends of cigarette smoking amongst Syrian refugees during their first two years in Canada. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 2021; 23(3):640–5. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33570700 

28. Webb Hooper M, Calixte-Civil P, Verzijl C, Brandon KO, Asfar T, et al. Associations between Perceived Racial Discrimination and Tobacco Cessation among Diverse Treatment Seekers. Ethn Dis, 2020; 30(3):411–20. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32742143 

29. Assari S. Socioeconomic Status and Current Cigarette Smoking Status: Immigrants' Diminished Returns. Int J Travel Med Glob Health, 2020; 8(2):66–72. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32656271 

30. Kearns R, Gardner K, Silveira M, Woodland L, Hua M, et al. Shaping interventions to address waterpipe smoking in Arabic-speaking communities in Sydney, Australia: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health, 2018; 18(1):1379. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30558567 

31. Cancer Institute NSW. Culturally and linguistically diverse priority populations: Formative research for tobacco control. 2019. Available from: https://www.cancer.nsw.gov.au/about-cancer/document-library/culturally-and-linguistically-diverse-priority-pop 

32. Poureslami I, Shum J, Aran N, and Tregobov N. Chinese- and English-speaking adult current smokers' perspectives on smoking and culturally and linguistically appropriate cessation: a qualitative analysis. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, 2020; 15(1):23. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32631420 

33. Jaworski A, Green B, Kennett K, Mayol A, and Rowe R. Tobacco cessation experiences and needs: perspectives from Arabic-speaking communities. J Ethn Subst Abuse, 2020:1–19. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32990528  

34. Reiss K, Lehnhardt J, and Razum O. Factors associated with smoking in immigrants from non-western to western countries - what role does acculturation play? A systematic review. Tobacco Induced Diseases, 2015; 13(1):11. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25908932 

35. O'Loughlin J, Maximova K, Fraser K, and Gray-Donald K. Does the "healthy immigrant effect" extend to smoking in immigrant children? The Journal of Adolescent Health, 2010; 46(3):299–301. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20159509 

36. Rooney BL, Choudhary R, and Bliss A. Social determinants of smoking among Hmong Americans residing in Wisconsin. WMJ, 2009; 108(9):439–46. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20131685 

37. Joshi S, Jatrana S, and Paradies Y. Tobacco smoking between immigrants and non-immigrants in Australia: A longitudinal investigation of the effect of nativity, duration of residence and age at arrival. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 2018; 29(3):282–92. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30511489 

38. Carroll T, Katz C, and Carvill K. The National Tobacco Campaign: Targeting people from Non-English Speaking Backgrounds. Australia’s National Tobacco Campaign: evaluation report one: every cigarette is doing you damage, 1999. Available from: https://catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/1402074 

39. Jukic A, Pino N, and Flaherty B. Alcohol and other drug use, attitudes and knowledge amongst Arabic speakers in Sydney. DAMEC, 1996. Available from: http://catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/1104884 

40. Phillips A, Monaem A, and Newman C. A qualitative study of smoking within a Western Sydney Arabic-speaking community: a focus on men in the context of their families. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 2015; 26(1):10–5. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25798526 

41. Jiang N, Zhang Y, Qian X, Thorpe L, Trinh-Shevrin C, et al. Chinese immigrant smokers' access barriers to tobacco cessation services and experience using social media and text messaging. Tob Prev Cessat, 2020; 6:52. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33083680 

42. Katigbak C, Maglalang DD, Chao YY, Au H, Liang W, et al. Cultural perspectives on tobacco use and cessation among Chinese American immigrants: A community-engaged qualitative study. J Transcult Nurs, 2019; 30(4):350–8. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30556472 

43. Attarabeen O, Alkhateeb F, Sambamoorthi U, Larkin K, Newton M, et al. Impact of cognitive and social factors on smoking cessation attempts among US adult Muslim smokers. Innov Pharm, 2020; 11(3). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34007626 

44. Poureslami IM, Shum J, Cheng N, and FitzGerald JM. Does culture or illness change a smoker's perspective on cessation? American Journal of Health Behavior, 2014; 38(5):657–67. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24933135 

45. Nierkens V, Hartman MA, Nicolaou M, Vissenberg C, Beune EJ, et al. Effectiveness of cultural adaptations of interventions aimed at smoking cessation, diet, and/or physical activity in ethnic minorities. a systematic review. PLoS One, 2013; 8(10):e73373. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24116000 

46. Simmons VN, Sutton SK, Medina-Ramirez P, Martinez U, Brandon KO, et al. Self-help smoking cessation intervention for Spanish-speaking Hispanics/Latinxs in the United States: A randomized controlled trial. Cancer, 2022; 128(5):984–94. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34679188 

47. Paz Castro R, Schaub MP, and Salis Gross C. An adapted smoking-cessation intervention for Turkish-speaking migrants in Switzerland: Predictors of smoking outcomes at one-year follow-up. PLoS One, 2021; 16(3):e0247157. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33735227 

48. Asfar T, Koru-Sengul T, Antoni MA, Dorsey A, Ruano Herreria EC, et al. Recruiting racially and ethnically diverse smokers seeking treatment: Lessons learned from a smoking cessation randomized clinical trial. Addictive Behaviors, 2022; 124:107112. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34530210 

49. Cartujano-Barrera F, Sanderson Cox L, Arana-Chicas E, Ramirez M, Perales-Puchalt J, et al. Feasibility and acceptability of a culturally- and linguistically-adapted smoking cessation text messaging intervention for Latino smokers. Front Public Health, 2020; 8:269. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32714891 

50. Asfar T, Arheart KL, McClure LA, Ruano-Herreria EC, Dietz NA, et al. Implementing a novel workplace smoking cessation intervention targeting Hispanic/Latino construction workers: A pilot cluster randomized trial. Health Educ Behav, 2021; 48(6):795–804. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33063570 

51. Pinsker EA, Call KT, Tanaka A, Kahin AA, Dar SI, et al. The development of culturally appropriate tobacco prevention videos targeted toward Somali youth. Prog Community Health Partnersh, 2017; 11(2):129–36. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28736405 

52. Haddad LG, Al-Bashaireh AM, Ferrell AV, and Ghadban R. Effectiveness of a culturally-tailored smoking cessation intervention for Arab-American men. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2017; 14(4). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28406462 

53. Zhao X, Peterson EB, Oh KM, and Cai X. Using graphic text-messaging to promote smoking cessation among first-generation Chinese and Korean male immigrants. Health Education Research, 2019; 34(3):332–44. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30805618 

54. Londono T, Moore JR, Guerra ZC, Heydarian NM, and Castro Y. The contribution of positive affect and loneliness on readiness and self-efficacy to quit smoking among Spanish-speaking Mexican American smokers. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 2022; 48(1):110–9. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34932409 

55. Kenny JD, Tsoh JY, Nguyen BH, Le K, and Burke NJ. Keeping each other accountable: Social strategies for smoking cessation and healthy living in Vietnamese American men. Fam Community Health, 2021; 44(3):215–24. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33055576 

56. Unal M, Ozturk O, Ozturk G, Fidanci I, Atayoglu AT, et al. Effect of fasting on smoking addiction: A multicentered primary care research. Journal of Addictions Nursing, 2021. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34593700 

57. Pratt R, Ojo-Fati O, DuBois D, Okuyemi K, Graham AL, et al. Testing the feasibility and acceptability of a religiously-tailored text messaging intervention to reduce smoking among Somali Muslim men during Ramadan. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 2021; 23(8):1283–90. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33277991 

58. Pratt R, Ojo-Fati O, Adam A, Sharif H, Kahin A, et al. Text message support for smoking cessation during Ramadan: A focus group study with Somali Immigrant Muslim men. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 2020; 22(9):1636–9. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31563964 

59. Ward KD, Siddiqi K, Ahluwalia JS, Alexander AC, and Asfar T. Waterpipe tobacco smoking: The critical need for cessation treatment. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 2015. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26054945 

60. Asfar T, Al Ali R, Rastam S, Maziak W, and Ward KD. Behavioral cessation treatment of waterpipe smoking: The first pilot randomized controlled trial. Addictive Behaviors, 2014; 39(6):1066–74. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24629480 

61. Maziak W, Jawad M, Jawad S, Ward KD, Eissenberg T, et al. Interventions for waterpipe smoking cessation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2015; 7:CD005549. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26228266 

62. Jawad M, Jawad S, Waziry RK, Ballout RA, and Akl EA. Interventions for waterpipe tobacco smoking prevention and cessation: a systematic review. Sci Rep, 2016; 6:25872. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27167891 

63. Gardner K, Kearns R, Woodland L, Silveira M, Hua M, et al. A scoping review of the evidence on health promotion interventions for reducing waterpipe smoking: Implications for practice. Front Public Health, 2018; 6:308. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6230676/pdf/fpubh-06-00308.pdf 

64. Dogar O, Zahid R, Mansoor S, Kanaan M, Ahluwalia JS, et al. Varenicline versus placebo for waterpipe smoking cessation: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Addiction, 2018. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30187978 

65. Hall MG, Mendel JR, Noar SM, and Brewer NT. Why smokers avoid cigarette pack risk messages: Two randomized clinical trials in the United States. Social Science & Medicine, 2018; 213:165–72. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30096636 

66. Li L, Zhan S, Hu L, Wilson KM, Mazumdar M, et al. Examining the role of healthcare access in racial/ethnic disparities in receipt of provider-patient discussions about smoking: A latent class analysis. Preventive Medicine, 2021; 148:106584. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33930432 

67. Carroll DM and Cole A. Racial/ethnic group comparisons of quit ratios and prevalences of cessation-related factors among adults who smoke with a quit attempt. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 2022; 48(1):58–68. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34752715 

68. Guan A, Kim-Mozeleski JE, Tan JY, McPhee SJ, Burke NJ, et al. Serious quit attempts and cessation implications for Asian American male smokers. Addictive Behaviors, 2020; 100:106129. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31627162 

69. Quinn EC, Sacks R, Farley SM, and Thihalolipavan S. Development of culturally appropriate support strategies to increase uptake of nicotine replacement therapy among Russian- and Chinese-speaking smokers in New York City. Journal of Community Health, 2017; 42(3):431–6. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27743335 

70. Medina-Ramirez P, Calixte-Civil P, Meltzer LR, Brandon KO, Martinez U, et al. Comparing methods of recruiting Spanish-preferring smokers in the United States: Findings from a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2020; 22(8):e19389. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32795986 

71. Culpin A, Gleeson S, Thomas M, and Bekiaris J. Evaluation of the 'Good Heart, Good Life’ project: a three year campaign to reduce smoking among the Greek community of Sydney's inner west. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 1996; 6:44–9. Available from: https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/INFORMIT.461247238329638 

72. NSW Multicultural Health Communication. New project raises awareness of passive smoking risks among Arabic speaking students. Polyglot: news from Multicultural Health Communication, 2008; 12(2).

73. Quit. Resources to support multicultural communities. 2022. Available from: https://www.quit.org.au/resources/multicultural-groups/multicultural-groups-taking-action/ 

74. Girgis S, Adily A, Velasco MJ, Zwar NA, Jalaludin BB, et al. Feasibility, acceptability and impact of a telephone support service initiated in primary medical care to help Arabic smokers quit. Aust J Prim Health, 2011; 17(3):274–81. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21896264